State of Conservation
21
Reports
21
Properties concerned
19
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2007close
Date end:2007close
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Belgium France |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected areas (mainly the Ottoman period timber houses in the district of Zeyrek and Süleymaniye) |
States Parties: | Estonia |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Czechia |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Austria |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Japan |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Chile |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, and stucco and lightweight construction that functioned with regular maintenance; Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years ; Metal cladding corroded and some of the structural elements dismantled. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is given ; Very little conservation work carried ou |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Lack of systematic monitoring of the site |
States Parties: | Honduras |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Air transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A.Add.2,WHC-07/31.COM/7A.Add.3 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Natural risk factorsDeterioration of monuments |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Bahrain |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure Marine transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.