State of Conservation
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Italy Holy See |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Italy Holy See |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Brazil |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Brazil |
Year: | 1987 |
Document Source: | SC-87/CONF.005/9 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Brazil |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Cybernetic fountain; Panaromic lifts to serve the inscribed part from other quarters of the town |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 1987 |
Document Source: | SC-87/CONF.005/INF.1 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Fires |
States Parties: | Brazil |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Brazil |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 1991 |
Document Source: | SC-91/CONF.002/4 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/13 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.202/INF.6,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties
Australia Brazil Chile China Colombia Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Dominica Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia Finland Germany Greece Guatemala Guinea Holy See Honduras Iran (Islamic Republic of) Italy Jordan Lebanon Mexico Morocco Nepal Panama Peru Portugal Senegal Seychelles Spain Sweden Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States of America Viet Nam
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.