State of Conservation
38
Reports
38
Properties concerned
37
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2017close
Date end:2017close
States Parties: | Costa Rica |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | fire |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Afghanistan |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Risk of collapse of the Giant Buddha niches; Irreversible deterioration of the mural paintings |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Thailand |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Forest fragmentation / Need for ecological corridors |
States Parties: | Gabon |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add2,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas); Land Reclamation project |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Austria |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Lack of adequate fire fighting arrangements in the historic urban zone |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add2,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Morocco |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Nothofagus dieback |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Albania North Macedonia |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Challenging situation of community livelihoods; Condition and conservation of the Laetoli hominid footprints |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7A,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Austria Bahrain Cameroon Central African Republic China Congo Costa Rica Democratic Republic of the Congo Egypt Ethiopia Gabon Germany India Indonesia Jordan Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Morocco Nepal Nigeria North Macedonia Pakistan Peru Russian Federation Senegal Syrian Arab Republic Thailand Türkiye Uganda United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Viet Nam Yemen
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.