Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

Historic Areas of Istanbul

Türkiye
Factors affecting the property in 2017*
  • Ground transport infrastructure
  • Housing
  • Management activities
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Underground transport infrastructure
  • Other Threats:

    Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas); Land Reclamation project

Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas)
  • Quality of repairs and reconstruction of the Roman and Byzantine Walls and associated palace structures, including Tekfur Saray and the "Anemas Dungeon" (Blachernae Palace)
  • Development
  • Absence of a World Heritage management plan (issue resolved)
  • Lack of coordination between national and municipal authorities and of decision-making bodies for safeguarding World Heritage at the site
  • Impacts of new buildings and new development projects on the World Heritage property, mainly within the framework of Law 5366, and lack of impact studies before large-scale developments are implemented
  • Adverse impacts from the new metro bridge across the Golden Horn as well as from the Eurasia Tunnel Project (issue partly resolved)
  • Eurasia Tunnel approach road of eight-lane at Yenikapı and Samatya
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2017

Total amount granted: USD 211,900 (Conservation of Hagia Sophia); USD 36,686.30 (Convention France-UNESCO); USD 155,000 (in the framework of the International Safeguarding Campaign for Istanbul and Göreme)

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2017
Requests approved: 16 (from 1986-2004)
Total amount approved : 452,208 USD
Missions to the property until 2017**

November 1997: ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission; October 1998: World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission; January 2000, May 2001, 2002, December 2003, December 2004: World Heritage Centre missions; April 2006, May 2008, April 2009, November 2012: World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission; December 2016: Reactive monitoring mission World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS

2016 Report on the joint UNESCO World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission to the World Heritage site of ...
2012 Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Reactif Monitoring Mission to the Historic Areas of Istanbul, ...
2009 Report on the Joint UNESCO/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring Mission to the Historic Areas of Istanbul, 27-30 April 2009
2008 Report on the Joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Mission to the Historic Areas of Istanbul, 8-13 May 2008
2001 Report on mission to report on the impact of subway construction on the World Heritage values of the Historic Areas ...
2000 UNESCO Expert Mission Report, Historic Areas of Istanbul, 29 October – 5 November 2000
2000 Report on the Mission at Hagia Sophia, Istanbul (3rd visit), 26-28 January 2000
1999 Report on the Mission at Hagia Sophia, Istanbul (2nd visit), 7-9 June 1999
1999 WHC Mission Report, Historic Areas of Istanbul, April 1999
1999 Report on the Mission at Hagia Sophia, Istanbul (1st visit), 18-19 March 1999
1998 Report on the Joint UNESCO/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring Mission to Istanbul, October 1998
1998 Report of a Mission to Ephesus, Pamukkale and Hagia Sophia; 5-8 March 1998
1997 Report on the ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring Mission to Istanbul, November 1997
1993 Report on the UNESCO Mission to Istanbul to report on the present State of the Hagia Sophia Monument and make ...
1993 First UNESCO Mission Report, Historic Areas of Istanbul
1993 Second UNESCO Mission Report, Historic Areas of Istanbul
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2017

A joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission visited the property in December 2016 (mission report available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/356/documents). Subsequently, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report on 31 January 2017, which is available at the same address. Progress on a number of conservation issues addressed by the Committee at its previous sessions is presented in these reports, as follows:

  • The revision of the Historic Peninsula Management Plan was completed in August 2016 taking into account the recommendations of the World Heritage Committee and ICOMOS;
  • Eurasia tunnel project: Some improvements have been achieved in the design of the eight-lane approach road along the edge of the Sea of Marmara shore next to the Sea Walls, in response to the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), only undertaken after approval of the project. The tunnel operation building and some of the toll kiosks have been moved to the Asian side and the height of the ventilation chimney has been reduced to 5 metres. Pedestrian crossings at Yenikapı and Samatya have been introduced to reinforce city-sea connections. The road south of the Marble Tower has been re-routed to reunite it with the Land Walls. The Eurasia Tunnel opened in December 2016;
  • Yenikapı land reclamation project: A large 20-metre high, white Activity Tent of 6,500 square metres is being constructed. An HIA is being undertaken simultaneously to its construction;
  • Silhouette Master Plan: The Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality has prepared 3D Surface Models of the Historic Peninsula utilizing laser technology (LIDAR) as a basis for a 3D model to allow more detailed examination of the impact of new projects;
  • Renewal Areas Projects: The Municipality of Fatih has revised its renewal area projects on a ‘parcel-based approach’ to include street fabric and infrastructure as well as the restoration and conservation of structures. Outline details are provided on renewal area projects in the neighbourhoods of Arnavut, Atik Mustafa Paşa (Ayvansaray), Küçük Mustafa Paşa and Haraççı Kara Mehmet, Yedikule Yenikapı Coast Beyazıtağa (Wall No. I) and Ereğli, Nişanca and its Associated Area, and Aksaray and its Associated Area;
  • Ottoman timber houses: Grants for basic repair have been reintroduced. Although this measure is welcome, the December 2016 mission noted that the overall state of conservation of the remaining timber houses, as a result of decay and demolition through urban renewal schemes continues to raise serious concerns;
  • Conservation projects: Work has been completed on the conservation of the Belgradkapı and Seyyid Nizam Mosques, the Akdeniz Madrasa and the Zeyrek Sheikh Süleyman Masjid (in collaboration with the State Party of Italy). Work is on-going on the Spice Bazaar, the Karadeniz Madrasa and Tanneries, the Mahmutpaşa, Rüstempaşa and Zeyrek Mosques, the Chora, and the Hagios Georgios Church. Large-scale restoration and reconstruction projects have been approved by the Conservation Board for all areas. Projects are being initiated for 5.6km of the Land Walls, parts of which the mission noted were in serious and urgent need of conservation, and for the Hagia Sophia medrese;
  • New Projects: A Planetarium and large new Istanbul City Museum within the Topkapı Cultural Park have been approved. The Dardanelles 1915 Museum including a four-storey performance hall has been submitted for approval.
Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2017

The mission considered the impact of the Eurasia Tunnel approach road and the Yenikapı land reclamation scheme, the state of conservation of the Ottoman timber houses and the Land Walls and the revision of the Management Plan.

The potential ‘severe negative impact’ on the southern edge of the historic peninsula of the Eurasia Tunnel approach road, an eight-lane urban expressway with two grade-separated interchanges at Yenikapı and Samatya, assessed by the previous mission in 2012, has been confirmed by the 2016 mission. The development of an HIA was carried out after the project was given approval, leaving little room for addressing the recommendations by the Committee on improvements to be made to mitigate its impact. A positive change has been the re-routing of the road south of the Marble Tower, reuniting it with the Land Walls.

The Yenikapı land reclamation project has significantly changed the shape of the peninsula. A large white ‘Activity Tent’ was in course of construction in late 2016. Taken together, the mission considered that these have caused moderate harm to people’s ability to appreciate the historic form and some views of the silhouette of the peninsula. The HIA for the land reclamation project was undertaken after most of the work was completed and while construction of the Activity Tent was on-going.

The common factor in all recent major infrastructure projects, since the Haliç metro bridge, has been the decision to proceed with the implementation of the projects in advance of HIAs being undertaken and of engagement with the Committee. Furthermore, no project details or HIAs have been provided to the World Heritage Centre for the major new Urban Renewal, conservation projects and approved or proposed new buildings mentioned in the State Party report, apart from for the Zeyrek mosque, nor were details of these provided to the mission.

The amount of resources being directed at conservation projects is impressive but so far no details of any of the major projects, such as those for the Land Walls and the the Bucoleon Palace, have been submitted for review, even though the Committee has been requesting these since 2004.

While welcoming the introduction of grants for the repair of Ottoman timber houses, the mission highlighted the continuing degradation of many of these structures for which the Committee has requested action since 2004. In the meantime, urban renewal projects have resulted in some being demolished that were considered irreparable. As urban renewal projects are being actively developed in seven extensive areas, there is an urgent need for the development of the overall long term conservation strategy for the Ottoman houses, as requested by the Committee, so that clear parameters can be been provided to demonstrate that these projects will not result in further demolition.

While the Management Plan has been revised, and this is welcomed, it still needs further work to include a detailed list of the attributes of Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), which should underpin its policies, inform the development of major projects and provide the basis of HIAs.

It is recommended that the Committee express concern that the pace of change in the Historic Peninsula is resulting in a plethora of major projects, both for conservation and new construction, for which no details or HIAs have been provided for review before decisions are taken, and in a large number of renewal area projects which bring many social benefits, but for which no details have been provided to address concerns, expressed by the Committee over more than a decade, that they will prioritize new construction over restoration, leading to further erosion of the attributes of OUV.

To encourage an immediate and proportional response to these structural problems that have the potential to cumulatively impact on OUV, it is also recommended that the Committee request the State Party to clearly define the attributes of OUV in the Management Plan; to ensure the World Heritage Centre is notified of all major projects along with HIAs; and to develop a long-term Conservation strategy for the Ottoman timber buildings, all by 1 February 2018.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2017
41 COM 7B.52
Historic Areas of Istanbul (Turkey) (C 356)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 39 COM 7B.83, adopted at its 39th session (Bonn, 2015),
  3. Welcomes the re-routing of the Eurasia Tunnel approach road to the south of the Marble Tower, thus reuniting it with the Land Walls;
  4. Notes with concern, nonetheless, that the eight-lane Eurasia Tunnel approach road with two grade-separated interchanges at Yenikapı and Samatya, has had overall a severe impact on the southern edge of the historic peninsula, cutting off the city from the sea, and confirming the potential ‘severe negative impact’ assessed by the 2012 Reactive Monitoring mission;
  5. Notes that the Yenikapı reclamation project has significantly changed the shape of the historic peninsula; and that a large white ‘Activity Tent’ is in course of construction, which taken together, impact on the historic form and some views of the silhouette of the peninsula;
  6. Regrets that the Heritage Impact Assessments (HIAs) for these projects and engagement with the Committee were only undertaken after approval had been given, as has been the case with all recent major infrastructure projects, since the Haliç metro bridge, thus leaving only minor opportunities for amendment;
  7. Also notes that a similar situation prevails for the already approved Planetarium and Istanbul City Museum within the Topkapı Cultural Park, and the Dardanelles 1915 Museum and four-storey performance hall, that have been submitted for approval; and requests the State Party to submit full details of all these projects to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  8. Expresses concern that in spite of requests for action since 2004, and a request for the development of a long term conservation strategy, the corpus of Ottoman timber houses continues to deteriorate, with some being demolished as part of Urban Renewal Projects;
  9. While also welcoming the revision of the Management Plan, further notes that it still needs to be supplemented with full details of the attributes of Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) to underpin its policies, inform the development of major projects and provide the basis of HIAs;
  10. Further expresses concern that although Urban Renewal areas can provide social benefits, no reassurances have so far been provided that the many areas now being renewed will not suffer loss of historic fabric;
  11. Notes furthermore that as the pace of change in the Historic Peninsula is resulting in a plethora of major projects, both for conservation and new construction that have the potential to cumulatively impact highly negatively on OUV, and considers that as an immediate, firm response is needed to these structural problems, also requests the State Party to:
    1. Define the attributes that convey the OUV of the property in the Management Plan and where necessary survey and document these attributes, before the Plan is approved,
    2. Commit to ensuring that all proposed or ongoing major projects which may affect the OUV of the property are subject to HIAs and notified to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies before an irreversible commitment is made,
    3. Submit to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies, details of current major new projects for the Planetarium and Istanbul City Museum within the Topkapı Cultural Park, the Dardanelles 1915 Museum and performance hall; and for current major restoration projects, including the rehabilitation of the Land Walls, the Bucoleon Palace, the reconstruction of the Hagia Sophia medrese, and the Zeyrek and Chora mosques,
    4. Devise an overall long-term conservation strategy for the Ottoman/vernacular timber buildings, based on documentation of what remains and an emergency plan to stem ongoing decay and loss;
  12. Further requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2018, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 42nd session in 2018.
41 COM 8B.48
Historic Areas of Istanbul (Turkey)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Documents WHC/17/41.COM/8B.Add and WHC/17/41.COM/INF.8B1.Add,
  2. Approves the proposed minor modification to the boundaries of the Historic Areas of Istanbul, Turkey;
  3. Recommends the State Party to consider simplifying the names of the four component parts of the property.
Draft Decision: 41 COM 7B.52

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 39 COM 7B.83, adopted at its 39th session (Bonn, 2015),
  3. Welcomes the re-routing of the Eurasia Tunnel approach road to the south of the Marble Tower, thus reuniting it with the Land Walls;
  4. Notes with concern, nonetheless, that the eight-lane Eurasia Tunnel approach road with two grade-separated interchanges at Yenikapı and Samatya, has had overall a severe impact on the southern edge of the historic peninsula, cutting off the city from the sea, and confirming the potential ‘severe negative impact’ assessed by the 2012 Reactive Monitoring mission;
  5. Notes that the Yenikapı reclamation project has significantly changed the shape of the historic peninsula; and that a large white ‘Activity Tent’ is in course of construction, which taken together, impact on the historic form and some views of the silhouette of the peninsula;
  6. Regrets that the Heritage Impact Assessments (HIAs) for these projects and engagement with the Committee were only undertaken after approval had been given, as has been the case with all recent major infrastructure projects, since the Haliç metro bridge, thus leaving only minor opportunities for amendment;
  7. Also notes that a similar situation prevails for the already approved Planetarium and Istanbul City Museum within the Topkapı Cultural Park, and the Dardanelles 1915 Museum and four-storey performance hall, that have been submitted for approval; and requests the State Party to submit full details of all these projects to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  8. Expresses concern that in spite of requests for action since 2004, and a request for the development of a long term conservation strategy, the corpus of Ottoman timber houses continues to deteriorate, with some being demolished as part of Urban Renewal Projects;
  9. While also welcoming the revision of the Management Plan, further notes that it still needs to be supplemented with full details of the attributes of Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) to underpin its policies, inform the development of major projects and provide the basis of HIAs;
  10. Further expresses concern that although Urban Renewal areas can provide social benefits, no reassurances have so far been provided that the many areas now being renewed will not suffer loss of historic fabric;
  11. Notes furthermore that as the pace of change in the Historic Peninsula is resulting in a plethora of major projects, both for conservation and new construction that have the potential to cumulatively impact highly negatively on OUV, and considers that as an immediate, firm response is needed to these structural problems, also requests the State Party to:
    1. Define the attributes that convey the OUV of the property in the Management Plan and where necessary survey and document these attributes, before the Plan is approved,
    2. Commit to ensuring that all proposed or ongoing major projects which may affect the OUV of the property are subject to HIAs and notified to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies before an irreversible commitment is made,
    3. Submit to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies, details of current major new projects for the Planetarium and Istanbul City Museum within the Topkapı Cultural Park, the Dardanelles 1915 Museum and performance hall; and for current major restoration projects, including the rehabilitation of the Land Walls, the Bucoleon Palace, the reconstruction of the Hagia Sophia medrese, and the Zeyrek and Chora mosques,
    4. Devise an overall long-term conservation strategy for the Ottoman/vernacular timber buildings, based on documentation of what remains and an emergency plan to stem ongoing decay and loss;
  12. Further requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2018, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 42nd session in 2018.
Report year: 2017
Türkiye
Date of Inscription: 1985
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (i)(ii)(iii)(iv)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2017) .pdf
Report (2016) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 41COM (2017)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top