State of Conservation
26
Reports
11
Properties concerned
7
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2000close
Threats* : Air transport infrastructureclose
Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructureclose
Ground transport infrastructureclose
Marine transport infrastructureclose
Underground transport infrastructureclose
Region:
Arab Statesclose
| States Parties: |
 Oman
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Oman
|
| Year: | 1999 |
| Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Lebanon
|
| Year: | 1996 |
| Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Lebanon
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
| Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Morocco
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Morocco
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Morocco
|
| Year: | 1996 |
| Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Morocco
|
| Year: | 1995 |
| Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Egypt
|
| Year: | 1999 |
| Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
| States Parties: |
Egypt
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
| States Parties: |
Egypt
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
| States Parties: |
Egypt
|
| Year: | 1995 |
| Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
| States Parties: |
Egypt
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
| States Parties: |
 Yemen
|
| Year: | 1999 |
| Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Increasing number of dilapidated buildings |
| States Parties: |
 Jordan
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Conservation of antiquities |
| States Parties: |
Jordan
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Conservation of antiquities |
| States Parties: |
Jordan
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Conservation of antiquities |
| States Parties: |
Jordan
|
| Year: | 1996 |
| Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Conservation of antiquities |
| States Parties: |
Jordan
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Syrian Arab Republic
|
| Year: | 1999 |
| Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | serious weathering of many stone blocks |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
