State of Conservation
States Parties: | Turkmenistan |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Turkmenistan |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Lack of maintenance ; Industrial pollution |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Lack of maintenance ; Halt of site excavations |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Lack of maintenance ; Halt of site excavations |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Lack of maintenance ; Halt of site excavations |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Unstable archaeological strata and cave roof |
States Parties: | Jordan |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | South Africa |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | a) Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities; b) Fire |
States Parties: | South Africa |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Benin |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Major deterioration of almost 50% of the earthen structural components; |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Belgium Benin Brazil Cambodia China Cyprus Dominican Republic Egypt Ethiopia Germany Greece Indonesia Italy Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Libya Mali Malta Morocco Paraguay Poland Slovenia South Africa Türkiye Turkmenistan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.