State of Conservation
States Parties: | Dominican Republic |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Collapse of buildings due to lack of maintenance |
States Parties: | Dominican Republic |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Portugal |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Portugal |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Deteriorating state of conservation |
States Parties: | Lithuania Russian Federation |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Earthen containment structures |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Earthen containment structures |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Fire |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Need for consolidation and conservation measures of the hydraulic work |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Panama |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Deterioration and destruction of the fabric by environmental factors |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Brazil Bulgaria Cambodia China Croatia Cuba Czechia Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Estonia France Germany Greece Guatemala Honduras India Indonesia Italy Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Lithuania Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Morocco Nepal Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Republic of Korea Romania Russian Federation South Africa Spain Türkiye Uganda United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uzbekistan Viet Nam Zambia Zimbabwe
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.