State of Conservation
112
Reports
27
Properties concerned
22
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
1992close
Region:
Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Fragile wooden heritage |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: | Ukraine |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: | Ukraine |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: | Ukraine |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | Conflict between the construction of new properties and the restoration of existing buildings |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
Other Threats: | a) Parts of the Thurn and Taxis Castle to be converted into a hoteb) Dachauplatz parking garage façade being redesigned |
States Parties: | Ireland |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: | Bosnia and Herzegovina Croatia Montenegro Serbia |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: | Lithuania |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Management activities |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Management activities |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.