State of Conservation
10
Reports
10
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2015close
Date end:2015close
Region:
Asia and the Pacificclose
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
chitwan national parkChitwan National Park | nepal Nepal | 2015 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
cultural landscape and archaeological remains of the bamiyan valleyCultural Landscape and Archaeological Remains of the Bamiyan Valley | afghanistan Afghanistan | 2015 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Risk of imminent collapse of the Giant Buddha niches; Irreversible deterioration of the mural paintings |
Yes |
dong phayayen-khao yai forest complexDong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex | thailand Thailand | 2015 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Forest fragmentation / Need for ecological corridors |
No |
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi | india India | 2015 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
kathmandu valleyKathmandu Valley | nepal Nepal | 2015 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
lorentz national parkLorentz National Park | indonesia Indonesia | 2015 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Nothofagus dieback |
No |
samarkand – crossroad of culturesSamarkand – Crossroad of Cultures | uzbekistan Uzbekistan | 2015 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Conservation of urban fabric |
No |
tropical rainforest heritage of sumatraTropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra | indonesia Indonesia | 2015 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
vat phou and associated ancient settlements within the champasak cultural landscapeVat Phou and Associated Ancient Settlements within the Champasak Cultural Landscape | lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic | 2015 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
wulingyuan scenic and historic interest areaWulingyuan Scenic and Historic Interest Area | china China | 2015 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.