Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

11
Reports
11
Properties concerned
12
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start: 2004close
Date end:2004close
Threats* : Ground transport infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
banc d'arguin national parkBanc d'Arguin National Park mauritania Mauritania 2004 Ground transport infrastructure, No
chitwan national parkChitwan National Park nepal Nepal 2004 Ground transport infrastructure, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2004 Ground transport infrastructure, No
lorentz national parkLorentz National Park indonesia Indonesia 2004 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Security limitations on staff and public access to parts of the Park; b) Fire
 No
phong nha-ke bang national parkPhong Nha-Ke Bang National Park viet nam Viet Nam 2004 Ground transport infrastructure, No
sangay national parkSangay National Park ecuador Ecuador 2004 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
sian ka'anSian Ka'an mexico Mexico 2004 Ground transport infrastructure, No
talamanca range-la amistad reserves / la amistad national parkTalamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park costa rica,panama Costa Rica
Panama		 2004 Ground transport infrastructure, No
volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka russian federation Russian Federation 2004 Ground transport infrastructure, No
wood buffalo national parkWood Buffalo National Park canada Canada 2004 Ground transport infrastructure, No
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park united states of america United States of America 2004 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Brucella infection threat to bison population
 No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top