Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

14
Reports
14
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2003close
Date end:2003close
Threats* : Commercial developmentclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
agra fortAgra Fort india India 2003 Commercial development, No
antigua guatemalaAntigua Guatemala guatemala Guatemala 2003 Commercial development, No
bahla fortBahla Fort oman Oman 2003 Commercial development, Yes
borobudur temple compoundsBorobudur Temple Compounds indonesia Indonesia 2003 Commercial development, No
fatehpur sikriFatehpur Sikri india India 2003 Commercial development, No
giant's causeway and causeway coastGiant's Causeway and Causeway Coast united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2003 Commercial development, No
hanseatic city of lubeckHanseatic City of Lübeck germany Germany 2003 Commercial development, No
historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla mexico Mexico 2003 Commercial development,
Other Threats: Fire in December 2002
No
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa peru Peru 2003 Commercial development, No
imperial palaces of the ming and qing dynasties in beijing and shenyangImperial Palaces of the Ming and Qing Dynasties in Beijing and Shenyang china China 2003 Commercial development, No
meidan emam, esfahanMeidan Emam, Esfahan iran (islamic republic of) Iran (Islamic Republic of) 2003 Commercial development, No
summer palace, an imperial garden in beijingSummer Palace, an Imperial Garden in Beijing china China 2003 Commercial development, No
taj mahalTaj Mahal india India 2003 Commercial development, No
temple of heaven: an imperial sacrificial altar in beijingTemple of Heaven: an Imperial Sacrificial Altar in Beijing china China 2003 Commercial development, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top