Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2005close
Date end:2005close
Threats* : Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
banc d'arguin national parkBanc d'Arguin National Park mauritania Mauritania 2005 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Absence of any real ecotourism policy and strategy; b) Poor progress recorded in the improvement of the living conditions of the local populations
No
city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco peru Peru 2005 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance of historic buildings; b) Use of reinforced concrete in the centre of town
No
danube deltaDanube Delta romania Romania 2005 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 2005 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2005 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and palpaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa peru Peru 2005 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) 2005 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Natural risk factors; b) Conservation of archaeological heritage; c) Deterioration of monuments; d) Alteration of the built fabric.
Yes
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park united states of america United States of America 2005 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top