Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

16
Reports
16
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2005close
Date end:2005close
Region: Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone peru Peru 2005 Legal framework, Relative humidity, Water (rain/water table),
Other Threats: Risk of desintegration and destruction of structures, surfaces and decorative art
Yes
chavin (archaeological site)Chavin (Archaeological Site) peru Peru 2005 Erosion and siltation/ deposition, Ground transport infrastructure, Management systems/ management plan, No
city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco peru Peru 2005 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: a) Lack of maintenance of historic buildings; b) Use of reinforced concrete in the centre of town
No
colonial city of santo domingoColonial City of Santo Domingo dominican republic Dominican Republic 2005 Housing, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Management activities, No
coro and its portCoro and its Port venezuela (bolivarian republic of) Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 2005 Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: a) Deterioration of the architectural and urban coherence and integrity of the property; b) Lack of adequate conservation mechanisms.
No
fortifications on the caribbean side of panama: portobelo-san lorenzoFortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo panama Panama 2005 Erosion and siltation/ deposition, Housing, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Management systems/ management plan,
Other Threats: Deterioration and destruction of the fabric by environmental factors
No
galápagos islandsGalápagos Islands ecuador Ecuador 2005 Illegal activities, Legal framework, Management activities,
Other Threats: Implementation of quarantine measures
No
historic quarter of the city of colonia del sacramentoHistoric Quarter of the City of Colonia del Sacramento uruguay Uruguay 2005 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, Management systems/ management plan, No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 2005 Avalanche/ landslide, Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Financial resources, Housing, Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation, Management systems/ management plan, No
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa peru Peru 2005 Deliberate destruction of heritage, Earthquake, Flooding, No
iguacu national parkIguaçu National Park brazil Brazil 2005 Commercial hunting, Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Management systems/ management plan, Water infrastructure, No
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and palpaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa peru Peru 2005 Crop production, Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, Illegal activities, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Management systems/ management plan, Mining, No
maya site of copanMaya Site of Copan honduras Honduras 2005 Air transport infrastructure, No
pre-hispanic city of teotihuacanPre-Hispanic City of Teotihuacan mexico Mexico 2005 Commercial development, Management systems/ management plan, No
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve honduras Honduras 2005 Crop production, Forestry /wood production, Human resources, Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Illegal activities, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Management systems/ management plan, Yes
sangay national parkSangay National Park ecuador Ecuador 2005 Ground transport infrastructure, Illegal activities, Land conversion, Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals, Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top