Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

98
Reports
48
Properties concerned
35
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2012index=41close
Date end:2012close
Threats* : Interpretative and visitation facilitiesclose
States Parties: Greece
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of documentation and equipment
States Parties: Cambodia
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Inadequate on-site security and control systems
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Inadequate on-site security and control systems
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance, insufficient guardianship and control system inside and outside the archaeological area
States Parties: Morocco
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Morocco
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Need to preserve the landscape
States Parties: Poland
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Poland
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Poland
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.6,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Poland
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Uncontrolled vendors within and around the property
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Albania
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: a) Lack of adequate protection and conservation of the site; b) Serious deterioration of materials resulting in an important loss of cultural significance
Danger List:  Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top