Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

98
Reports
48
Properties concerned
35
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2012close
Threats* : Interpretative and visitation facilitiesclose
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: China
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Dominican Republic
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Dominican Republic
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Dominican Republic
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Dominican Republic
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Deterioration of structures caused by natural and human hazards
States Parties: Dominican Republic
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Deterioration of structures caused by natural and human hazards
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Structural degradation of its components of the property
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected areas (mainly the Ottoman period timber houses in the district of Zeyrek and Süleymaniye)
States Parties: Belgium
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: China
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Paraguay
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Argentina Brazil
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top