Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

242
Reports
47
Properties concerned
33
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2012close
Threats* : Miningclose
Alejandro de Humboldt National Park (2010)
States Parties: Cuba
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Mining
Alejandro de Humboldt National Park (2009)
States Parties: Cuba
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Mining
Alejandro de Humboldt National Park (2008)
States Parties: Cuba
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Mining
Alejandro de Humboldt National Park (2007)
States Parties: Cuba
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Mining
Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks (2006)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Mining
Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks (2005)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Mining
Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks (1999)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5
Threats*: Mining
Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks (1998)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Mining
Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks (1997)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Mining
Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks (1996)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Mining
Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks (1995)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Mining
Caves of Aggtelek Karst and Slovak Karst (2002)
States Parties: Hungary Slovakia
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Mining
Caves of Aggtelek Karst and Slovak Karst (2001)
States Parties: Hungary Slovakia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Mining
City of Potosí (2012)
States Parties: Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Mining
Other Threats: Instability and risk of collapse of the Cerro Rico; Deficiencies in conservation: special attention required for the restoration and upgrading of structures with residential use and the archaeological industrial heritage
City of Potosí (2011)
States Parties: Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Mining
City of Potosí (1996)
States Parties: Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Mining
City of Potosí (1995)
States Parties: Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.202/5 Add.,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add
Threats*: Mining
Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape (2012)
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Mining
Danube Delta (2000)
States Parties: Romania
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Mining
Dja Faunal Reserve (2012)
States Parties: Cameroon
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Mining
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Australia Benin Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Burkina Faso Cameroon Canada Central African Republic China Côte d'Ivoire Cuba Democratic Republic of the Congo France Germany Guinea Hungary Indonesia Madagascar Nepal Niger Peru Romania Russian Federation Senegal Slovakia Solomon Islands South Africa Spain Uganda United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Viet Nam Zimbabwe
Threats
Mining 242

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top