Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

12
Reports
5
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2010close
Threats* : Other climate change impactsclose
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
States Parties: Uganda
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
States Parties: Canada United States of America
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Other climate change impacts
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/INF.6,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Other climate change impacts

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top