Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

7
Reports
7
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2016close
Date end:2016close
Threats* : Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
hill forts of rajasthanHill Forts of Rajasthan india India 2016 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: Vulnerabilities of certain individual structures within the forts requiring short-term conservation actions
No
national history park – citadel, sans souci, ramiersNational History Park – Citadel, Sans Souci, Ramiers haiti Haiti 2016 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) 2016 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
Yes
pergamon and its multi-layered cultural landscapePergamon and its Multi-Layered Cultural Landscape turkiye Türkiye 2016 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: Need to improve the monitoring system by specifying which organization is responsible for monitoring each indicator and include seismic monitoring
No
shahr-i sokhtaShahr-i Sokhta iran (islamic republic of) Iran (Islamic Republic of) 2016 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No
site of palmyraSite of Palmyra syrian arab republic Syrian Arab Republic 2016 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure,
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks
Yes
venice and its lagoonVenice and its Lagoon italy Italy 2016 Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top