Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2017close
Date end:2017close
Threats* : Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 2017 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
historic centre of viennaHistoric Centre of Vienna austria Austria 2017 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
memphis and its necropolis – the pyramid fields from giza to dahshurMemphis and its Necropolis – the Pyramid Fields from Giza to Dahshur egypt Egypt 2017 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
osun-osogbo sacred groveOsun-Osogbo Sacred Grove nigeria Nigeria 2017 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
ouadi qadisha (the holy valley) and the forest of the cedars of god (horsh arz el-rab)Ouadi Qadisha (the Holy Valley) and the Forest of the Cedars of God (Horsh Arz el-Rab) lebanon Lebanon 2017 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
petraPetra jordan Jordan 2017 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
site of palmyraSite of Palmyra syrian arab republic Syrian Arab Republic 2017 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure,
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks
 Yes
um er-rasas (kastrom mefa'a)Um er-Rasas (Kastrom Mefa'a) jordan Jordan 2017 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure,
Other Threats: Unstable structures and lack of security
 No
upper middle rhine valleyUpper Middle Rhine Valley germany Germany 2017 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top