Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

6
Reports
6
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2005close
Date end:2005close
Threats* : Financial resourcesclose
Fort and Shalamar Gardens in Lahore (2005)
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: a) Lack of capacity in conservation techniques; b) Lack of monitoring system
Danger List:  Yes
Historic Centre of Sighişoara (2005)
States Parties: Romania
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Deterioration of the monuments in general and the fortification in particular
Lamu Old Town (2005)
States Parties: Kenya
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: a) Fire; b) Lack of law enforcement
Rice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras (2005)
States Parties: Philippines
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Financial resources
Danger List:  Yes
Robben Island (2005)
States Parties: South Africa
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: a) Difficulties with operational aspects of maintenance and conservation implementation ; b) Lack of appropriate conservation of the built heritage; c) Lack of integration of natural values in management of site
Ruins of the Buddhist Vihara at Paharpur (2005)
States Parties: Bangladesh
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Lack of monitoring system
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Bangladesh Kenya Pakistan Philippines Romania South Africa
Threats
Financial resources 6

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top