State of Conservation
6
Reports
6
Properties concerned
4
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2006close
Date end:2006close
| States Parties: |
 Mauritania
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Estonia
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Peru
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Peru
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Lack of systematic monitoring of the site |
| States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A.Add.Rev |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monument |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 United States of America
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
