State of Conservation
19
Reports
1
Properties concerned
1
States Parties with SOC reports
Property:
Lumbini, the Birthplace of the Lord Buddhaclose
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2024 |
Document Source: | WHC/24/46.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: |
2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
|
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2021 |
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Impact of the new structure of the Maya Devi Temple (constructed in 2002) on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity. |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Impact of the new structure of the Maya Devi Temple (constructed in 2002) on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity. |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | b) Impact on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity of the property by the Maya Devi Temple constructed in 2002 |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Impact of the new structure of the Maya Devi Temple (constructed in 2002) on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity. |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Impact on the archaeological remains as well as on the visual integrity of the site by the newly constructed Maya Devi Temple in 2002. |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Impact of new structure of the Maya Devi Temple in the core area |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Extremely harsh natural environment; Improve the drainage for the Temple |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Extremely harsh natural environment; Improve the drainage for the Temple |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Extremely harsh natural environment; Improve the drainage for the Temple |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Extremely harsh natural environment |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
Other Threats: | Extremely harsh natural environment |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.