Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

7
Reports
7
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2001close
Date end:2001close
Threats* : Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and communityclose
Region: Africaclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
kahuzi-biega national parkKahuzi-Biega National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Yes
manovo-gounda st floris national parkManovo-Gounda St Floris National Park central african republic Central African Republic 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Yes
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea		 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Yes
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, No
serengeti national parkSerengeti National Park united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Threats to wildlife migration and populations
 No
simien national parkSimien National Park ethiopia Ethiopia 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community,
Other Threats: Loss of biodiversity
 Yes
virunga national parkVirunga National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2001 Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community, Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top