Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

42
Reports
12
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:1997close
Threats* : Miningclose
Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks (1997)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Mining
Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks (1996)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Mining
Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks (1995)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Mining
City of Potosí (1996)
States Parties: Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Mining
City of Potosí (1995)
States Parties: Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.202/5 Add.,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add
Threats*: Mining
Frontiers of the Roman Empire (1993)
States Parties: Germany United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/14
Threats*: Mining
Frontiers of the Roman Empire (1992)
States Parties: Germany United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 1992
Document Source: WHC-92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Mining
Great Barrier Reef (1997)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Mining
Great Barrier Reef (1994)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/16
Threats*: Mining
Great Barrier Reef (1986)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1986
Document Source: CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4
Threats*: Mining
Kakadu National Park (1997)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Mining
Kakadu National Park (1994)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2
Threats*: Mining
Kakadu National Park (1991)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/4
Threats*: Mining
Kakadu National Park (1986)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1986
Document Source: CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4
Threats*: Mining
Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (1997)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.204/2A,WHC-97/CONF.208/8A
Threats*: Mining
Danger List:  Yes
Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (1996)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7A,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Mining
Danger List:  Yes
Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (1995)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Mining
Danger List:  Yes
Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (1994)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Mining
Danger List:  Yes
Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (1993)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Mining
Danger List:  Yes
Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (1992)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Year: 1992
Document Source: CLT-92/CONF.003/3,WHC-92/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Mining
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Australia Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Canada Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Germany Guinea Russian Federation United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United States of America
Threats
Mining 42

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top