Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

25
Reports
25
Properties concerned
20
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2011close
Date end:2011close
Threats* : Management activitiesclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
aapravasi ghatAapravasi Ghat mauritius Mauritius 2011 Management activities, No
ancient city of damascusAncient City of Damascus syrian arab republic Syrian Arab Republic 2011 Management activities, No
archaeological areas of pompei, herculaneum and torre annunziataArchaeological Areas of Pompei, Herculaneum and Torre Annunziata italy Italy 2011 Management activities,
Other Threats: collapse of a wall
No
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene libya Libya 2011 Management activities, No
architectural, residential and cultural complex of the radziwill family at nesvizhArchitectural, Residential and Cultural Complex of the Radziwill Family at Nesvizh belarus Belarus 2011 Management activities, No
chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone peru Peru 2011 Management activities, Yes
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 2011 Management activities, No
cultural and historic ensemble of the solovetsky islandsCultural and Historic Ensemble of the Solovetsky Islands russian federation Russian Federation 2011 Management activities, No
everglades national parkEverglades National Park united states of america United States of America 2011 Management activities,
Other Threats: Mercury contamination of fish and wildlife
Yes
gelati monasteryGelati Monastery georgia Georgia 2011 Management activities,
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments
Yes
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul turkiye Türkiye 2011 Management activities,
Other Threats: a) Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas);
No
historic centre of bukharaHistoric Centre of Bukhara uzbekistan Uzbekistan 2011 Management activities, No
historic centre of limaHistoric Centre of Lima peru Peru 2011 Management activities, No
historic city of meknesHistoric City of Meknes morocco Morocco 2011 Management activities, No
historic ensemble of the potala palace, lhasaHistoric Ensemble of the Potala Palace, Lhasa china China 2011 Management activities, No
historical centre of the city of yaroslavlHistorical Centre of the City of Yaroslavl russian federation Russian Federation 2011 Management activities, No
historical monuments of mtskhetaHistorical Monuments of Mtskheta georgia Georgia 2011 Management activities, Yes
island of saint-louisIsland of Saint-Louis senegal Senegal 2011 Management activities,
Other Threats: Extremely poor state of conservation of numerous derelict buildings endangering occupants
No
kasbah of algiersKasbah of Algiers algeria Algeria 2011 Management activities, No
lumbini, the birthplace of the lord buddhaLumbini, the Birthplace of the Lord Buddha nepal Nepal 2011 Management activities,
Other Threats: Impact of the new structure of the Maya Devi Temple (constructed in 2002) on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity.
No
old city of jerusalem and its wallsOld City of Jerusalem and its Walls jerusalem (site proposed by jordan)Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) 2011 Management activities,
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments;
Yes
rice terraces of the philippine cordillerasRice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras philippines Philippines 2011 Management activities, Yes
timbuktuTimbuktu mali Mali 2011 Management activities,
Other Threats: a) Inappropriate design and scale of new Ahmed Baba Cultural Centre in the vicinity of the Sankoré Mosque; lack of detailed drawings supplied to the Committee;
No
tipasaTipasa algeria Algeria 2011 Management activities, No
tombs of buganda kings at kasubiTombs of Buganda Kings at Kasubi uganda Uganda 2011 Management activities, Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top