Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2007close
Date end:2007close
Threats* : Miningclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
alejandro de humboldt national parkAlejandro de Humboldt National Park cuba Cuba 2007 Mining, No
dja faunal reserveDja Faunal Reserve cameroon Cameroon 2007 Mining, No
kahuzi-biega national parkKahuzi-Biega National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2007 Mining, Yes
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and palpaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa peru Peru 2007 Mining,
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
 No
lorentz national parkLorentz National Park indonesia Indonesia 2007 Mining, No
manovo-gounda st floris national parkManovo-Gounda St Floris National Park central african republic Central African Republic 2007 Mining, Yes
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea		 2007 Mining, Yes
okapi wildlife reserveOkapi Wildlife Reserve democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2007 Mining, Yes
rwenzori mountains national parkRwenzori Mountains National Park uganda Uganda 2007 Mining,
Other Threats: Degradation of buffer zone
 No
tai national parkTaï National Park cote d'ivoire Côte d'Ivoire 2007 Mining, No
three parallel rivers of yunnan protected areasThree Parallel Rivers of Yunnan Protected Areas china China 2007 Mining, No
volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka russian federation Russian Federation 2007 Mining, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top