Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

14
Reports
14
Properties concerned
13
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2006close
Date end:2006close
Threats* : Miningclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
canadian rocky mountain parksCanadian Rocky Mountain Parks canada Canada 2006 Mining, No
dja faunal reserveDja Faunal Reserve cameroon Cameroon 2006 Mining, No
kahuzi-biega national parkKahuzi-Biega National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2006 Mining, Yes
lines and geoglyphs of nasca and palpaLines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Palpa peru Peru 2006 Mining,
Other Threats: Lack of systematic monitoring of the site
 No
lorentz national parkLorentz National Park indonesia Indonesia 2006 Mining, No
manovo-gounda st floris national parkManovo-Gounda St Floris National Park central african republic Central African Republic 2006 Mining,
Other Threats: Transhumance
 Yes
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea		 2006 Mining, Yes
nahanni national parkNahanni National Park canada Canada 2006 Mining, No
okapi wildlife reserveOkapi Wildlife Reserve democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2006 Mining, Yes
rwenzori mountains national parkRwenzori Mountains National Park uganda Uganda 2006 Mining,
Other Threats: Degradation of buffer zone
 No
selous game reserveSelous Game Reserve united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2006 Mining, No
three parallel rivers of yunnan protected areasThree Parallel Rivers of Yunnan Protected Areas china China 2006 Mining, No
volcanoes of kamchatkaVolcanoes of Kamchatka russian federation Russian Federation 2006 Mining, No
yellowstone national parkYellowstone National Park united states of america United States of America 2006 Mining, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top