jump to the content

State of Conservation (SOC)

Rwenzori Mountains National Park (2006)

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds
International Assistance granted to the property

Requests Approved: 0 (from1995-2005)
Total Amount Ap proved: 116,739USD

2005   Rwenzori Mountains National Park, Implementation of Annual ...   19,990  USD
2001   Emergency Assistance for Rwenzori Mountains National Park ...   64,500  USD
1996   Organize the Rwenzori Mountains Scientific Conference (15-16 ...   12,249  USD
1995   Equipment for Rwenzori Mountains National Park   20,000  USD
Missions**

Joint UNESCO-IUCN mission 5-11 January 2003.

Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports

a) Mining activities inside the property;

b) Staffing and budgetary deficiencies;

c) Degradation of buffer zone;

e) Impact of tourism and climbing expeditions.

Corrective Measures
Current conservation issues

The State Party submitted a State of Conservation report and the approved General management plan (2004-2014) on 26 October 2005. A map was also received showing the precise surveyed and marked boundary of the World Heritage property. A request for international assistance from the World Heritage Fund for the implementation of the Annual Operations Plan amounting to USD 19,990 was approved by the Chairperson in 2005 and is being implemented.

The State Party report provides an up-date on the activities of the management authority since the property was re-opened in 2001, following four years of closure due to insurgency and military intervention. The State Party report indicates significant progress towards strengthening of the conservation and natural resource management activities in and around the property. The priority for the next phase of the recovery programme included in the general management plan is to identify sustainable financing for the management of the property and its buffer zones.

The State Party report states that the general management plan is being implemented focusing on six main areas. There are community conservation; resource conservation and management; monitoring and research; park operations and maintenance; tourism development; and regional cooperation. The goal of the General management Plan is to ensure better conservation and protection of natural resources and to uplift the integrity of the park.

The World Bank’s Protected Area Management and Sustainable Use Programme and WWF are currently providing limited support for park management and a community conservation programme. However, substantial additional funding is still required to implement the general management plan 2004-2014.

The State Party also reported on the work of the Community Protected Area Institutions (CPIs), local community committees which work with Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) to address issues that affect community/Park relations, established upon the recommendation of the 2003 UNESCO-IUCN mission. At present, CPIs have been established in 22 adjacent sub-counties of three districts as well as an Inter-District CPI. It manages relationships with the communities, involves communities in protected area management and facilitates the implementation of benefit sharing projects. The possibility of establishing a memorandum of understanding between communities and Rwenzori Mountains National Park to share resources that occur within three kilometres inside the park is being studied.

According to the State Party report the main threats to the property at this point in time are threefold. They are: illegal timber cutting for commercial purposes; poaching of wildlife for domestic consumption; and illegal harvesting of bamboo for construction. Issues that represent a future threat to the World Heritage values of the property include: unplanned tourism development, including mountaineering; possible mining activities in and around the property; and population pressure on the boundary leading to the unsustainable use of natural resources.

The World Heritage Centre and IUCN consider the progress made by the State Party and UWA since the property was re-opened in 2001 to be very positive. The recently approved management plan incorporates the recommendations of the joint 2003 UNESCO/IUCN mission and provides a sound basis for the management of the World Heritage property for the period 2004-2014. The World Heritage Centre and IUCN recommend that the management authority follows an adaptive management approach in the implementation of the plan with a mid-term review in 2009.

Conclusion
Decision
  • Adopted

  • Draft Decision

30COM7B.6
Link to the decision

The World Heritage Committee,

1. Having examined Document WHC-06/30.COM/7B,

2. Recalling Decision 29 COM 7B.4, adopted at its 29th session (Durban, 2005);

3. Notes with thanks the general management plan and the map showing the precise surveyed and marked boundary of the World Heritage property submitted by the State Party;

4. Commends the Uganda Wildlife Authority for ongoing work to improve the management and conservation of the property, notably through the implementation of a 10 year management plan, as well as its considerable efforts to support the sustainable development of appropriate tourism in the park;

5. Further commends the State Party for the progress made since 2001 towards re-establishing the integrity of the World Heritage property;

6. Encourages the international donor and conservation community to provide additional financial and/or technical assistance for the implementation of the general management plan 2004-2014;

7. Requests the State Party to provide the World Heritage Centre with an updated report by 1 February 2007 on the state of conservation of the property, including information on how the main threats identified by the State Party are being dealt with, and in particular on the progress made in the implementation of the general management plan, for examination by the Committee at its 31st session in 2007.

Draft Decision: 30 COM 7B.6

The World Heritage Committee,

1. Having examined Document WHC-06/30.COM/7B,

2. Recalling Decision 29 COM 7B.4, adopted at its 29th session (Durban, 2005);

3. Notes with thanks the general management plan and the map showing the precise surveyed and marked boundary of the World Heritage property submitted by the State Party;

4. Commends the Uganda Wildlife Authority for ongoing work to improve the management and conservation of the property, notably through the implementation of a 10 year management plan, as well as considerable efforts to support the sustainable development of appropriate tourism in the park;

5. Further commends the State Party for the progress made since 2001 towards re-establishing the integrity of the World Heritage property;

6. Encourages the international donor and conservation community to provide additional financial and/or technical assistance for the implementation of the general management plan 2004-2014;

7. Requests the State Party to provide the World Heritage Centre with an updated report by 1 February 2007 on the state of conservation of the property, including information on how the main threats identified by the State Party are being dealt with, and in particular on the progress made in the implementation of the general management plan, for examination by the Committee at its 31st session in 2007.

Rwenzori Mountains National Park
State Party:
Uganda
Date of Inscription: 1994
Nomination records (Year): 1993
Category: Natural
Criteria: (vii)(x)
Exports
Word File
SOC Reports (year)
2012
2009
2007
2006
2005
2004
Threats*
  • Mining
  • Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation
  • Illegal activities
  • Financial resources
  • Human resources
  • Other Threats:
    Degradation of buffer zone
Inscription on the Danger List
Year: 1999 -2004
Threats to the Site:

The Committee noted the reports on various issues:

  • lack of resources, 
  • suspension of projects,
  • serious security issues at the Park due to the conflict in the region,
  • a greater part of the Park is not monitored by Park staff.

The Committee expressed its serious concerns regarding the security situation at this site. The Committee requested the Centre and IUCN to work closely with the Uganda Wildlife Authority. Communication with conservation NGOs and other international organizations present in the region, to discuss ways and means to publicize the need for all parties involved in the conflict in the region to respect the site’s World Heritage status and to develop projects to support site management should be seeked. The Committee decided to inscribe Rwenzori Mountains in the List of World Heritage in Danger.



* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.