Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

25
Reports
5
Properties concerned
5
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Mixedclose
Date end:2007close
Threats* : Ground transport infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 2003 Ground transport infrastructure, No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 2002 Ground transport infrastructure, No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 2001 Ground transport infrastructure, No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 2000 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Accident of a crane which damaged one of the most important monuments at Machu Picchu, the Intihuatana or stone sundial
 No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 1999 Ground transport infrastructure, No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 1998 Ground transport infrastructure, No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 1997 Ground transport infrastructure, No
historic sanctuary of machu picchuHistoric Sanctuary of Machu Picchu peru Peru 1996 Ground transport infrastructure, No
mount athosMount Athos greece Greece 2006 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Fire
 No
mount athosMount Athos greece Greece 1994 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: chemical pollution
 No
mount emei scenic area, including leshan giant buddha scenic areaMount Emei Scenic Area, including Leshan Giant Buddha Scenic Area china China 2003 Ground transport infrastructure, No
mount emei scenic area, including leshan giant buddha scenic areaMount Emei Scenic Area, including Leshan Giant Buddha Scenic Area china China 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
mount emei scenic area, including leshan giant buddha scenic areaMount Emei Scenic Area, including Leshan Giant Buddha Scenic Area china China 1999 Ground transport infrastructure, No
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2004 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Decline in animals population; b) Reduction of control fires
 No
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2002 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Decline of the fauna populations
 No
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2001 Ground transport infrastructure, No
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
ngorongoro conservation areaNgorongoro Conservation Area united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 1999 Ground transport infrastructure, No
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness australia Australia 2007 Ground transport infrastructure, No
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness australia Australia 2006 Ground transport infrastructure, No
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness australia Australia 2000 Ground transport infrastructure, No
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness australia Australia 1998 Ground transport infrastructure, No
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness australia Australia 1997 Ground transport infrastructure, No
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness australia Australia 1996 Ground transport infrastructure, No
tasmanian wildernessTasmanian Wilderness australia Australia 1995 Ground transport infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top