Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

23
Reports
23
Properties concerned
22
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2009close
Date end:2009close
Threats* : Management activitiesclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
ancient ksour of ouadane, chinguetti, tichitt and oualataAncient Ksour of Ouadane, Chinguetti, Tichitt and Oualata mauritania Mauritania 2009 Management activities, No
ancient city of damascusAncient City of Damascus syrian arab republic Syrian Arab Republic 2009 Management activities,
Other Threats: Poor state of conservation
No
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene libya Libya 2009 Management activities,
Other Threats: Inadequate on-site security and control systems
No
architectural, residential and cultural complex of the radziwill family at nesvizhArchitectural, Residential and Cultural Complex of the Radziwill Family at Nesvizh belarus Belarus 2009 Management activities, No
bahla fortBahla Fort oman Oman 2009 Management activities,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort
No
borobudur temple compoundsBorobudur Temple Compounds indonesia Indonesia 2009 Management activities, No
chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone peru Peru 2009 Management activities,
Other Threats: Continuous deterioration of earthen architecture structures and decorated surfaces from lack of conservation and maintenance practices
Yes
city of quitoCity of Quito ecuador Ecuador 2009 Management activities, No
colonial city of santo domingoColonial City of Santo Domingo dominican republic Dominican Republic 2009 Management activities, No
gelati monasteryGelati Monastery georgia Georgia 2009 Management activities,
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments
No
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul turkiye Türkiye 2009 Management activities,
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areaslack of impact studies before large-scale developments are implemented
No
historic centre of bruggeHistoric Centre of Brugge belgium Belgium 2009 Management activities, No
historic ensemble of the potala palace, lhasaHistoric Ensemble of the Potala Palace, Lhasa china China 2009 Management activities, No
historical centre of the city of yaroslavlHistorical Centre of the City of Yaroslavl russian federation Russian Federation 2009 Management activities,
Other Threats: Changes in the built fabric
No
historical monuments of mtskhetaHistorical Monuments of Mtskheta georgia Georgia 2009 Management activities,
Other Threats: f) Loss of authenticity
No
island of mozambiqueIsland of Mozambique mozambique Mozambique 2009 Management activities,
Other Threats: Growing number of collapsed or seriously dilapidated buildings;
No
island of saint-louisIsland of Saint-Louis senegal Senegal 2009 Management activities,
Other Threats: Extremely poor state of conservation of numerous derelict buildings endangering occupants;
No
old town of regensburg with stadtamhofOld town of Regensburg with Stadtamhof germany Germany 2009 Management activities, No
rice terraces of the philippine cordillerasRice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras philippines Philippines 2009 Management activities, Yes
rock-hewn churches, lalibelaRock-Hewn Churches, Lalibela ethiopia Ethiopia 2009 Management activities,
Other Threats: Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches.
No
samarkand – crossroad of culturesSamarkand – Crossroad of Cultures uzbekistan Uzbekistan 2009 Management activities, No
timbuktuTimbuktu mali Mali 2009 Management activities,
Other Threats: Lack of adequate maintenance of the buildings.
No
tipasaTipasa algeria Algeria 2009 Management activities, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top