Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

118
Reports
33
Properties concerned
27
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2018close
Threats* : Governanceclose
States Parties: Botswana
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: Animal sanitation and diseases
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7A.Add.2.Corr,WHC/18/42.COM/7A.Add2
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7A.Add2
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add.2
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2015
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7A.Add.2
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments;
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments;
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monuments
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7A.Add.2
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: a) Natural risk factors b) Deterioration of monuments
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A.Add.2,WHC-07/31.COM/7A.Add.3
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: Natural risk factorsDeterioration of monuments
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A.Add.Rev
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: Natural risk factors; Deterioration of monument
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan)
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Governance
Other Threats: a) Natural risk factors; b) Conservation of archaeological heritage; c) Deterioration of monuments; d) Alteration of the built fabric.
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Costa Rica
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7B
Threats*: Governance
States Parties: Madagascar
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Governance
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Madagascar
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7A.Add2
Threats*: Governance
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Madagascar
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A
Threats*: Governance
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Madagascar
Year: 2015
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7A
Threats*: Governance
Danger List:  Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top