Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

107
Reports
33
Properties concerned
26
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2014close
Threats* : Oil and gasclose
Lamu Old Town (2010)
States Parties: Kenya
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add.2
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Lack of adequate sewerage, waste disposal, and overall infrastructure, and risk to limited fresh water supplies; Fire
Lamu Old Town (2009)
States Parties: Kenya
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Fire
Mana Pools National Park, Sapi and Chewore Safari Areas (1994)
States Parties: Zimbabwe
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.1
Threats*: Oil and gas
Mana Pools National Park, Sapi and Chewore Safari Areas (1989)
States Parties: Zimbabwe
Year: 1989
Document Source: SC-89/CONF.003/12,SC-89/CONF.003/2,SC-89/CONF.004/12,SC-89/CONF.004/5
Threats*: Oil and gas
Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park (2003)
States Parties: Central African Republic
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A,WHC.03/27.COM/7A.Corr
Threats*: Oil and gas
Danger List:  Yes
Manú National Park (2011)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Oil and gas
Manú National Park (2010)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Oil and gas
Manú National Park (2008)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Oil and gas
Manú National Park (2007)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Oil and gas
Manú National Park (1989)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1989
Document Source: SC-89/CONF.003/12,SC-89/CONF.003/2,SC-89/CONF.004/12,SC-89/CONF.004/5
Threats*: Oil and gas
Manú National Park (1988)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1988
Document Source: SC-88/CONF.001/4A,SC-88/CONF.007/13
Threats*: Oil and gas
Miguasha National Park (2005)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Oil and gas
Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (2003)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7A
Threats*: Oil and gas
Danger List:  Yes
Nahanni National Park (2006)
States Parties: Canada
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Oil and gas
Salonga National Park (2014)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7A
Threats*: Oil and gas
Danger List:  Yes
Selous Game Reserve (2014)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Reduction of elephant population
Selous Game Reserve (2013)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7B
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Reduction of elephant population
Selous Game Reserve (2012)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: Reduction of elephant population
Selous Game Reserve (2011)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Oil and gas
Other Threats: b) Reduction of elephant populations;
Selous Game Reserve (2010)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Oil and gas
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Australia Bangladesh Belize Cameroon Canada Central African Republic Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo France Guinea Kenya Lithuania Malawi Mauritania Oman Panama Peru Philippines Russian Federation Spain United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Viet Nam Zimbabwe
Threats
Oil and gas 107

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top