Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Manú National Park

Peru
Factors affecting the property in 1988*
  • Oil and gas
International Assistance: requests for the property until 1988
Requests approved: 2 (from 1987-1988)
Total amount approved : 40,000 USD
Missions to the property until 1988**
Information presented to the Bureau of the World Heritage Committee in 1988

A commercial discovery of natural gas had been made next to the park and further exploration work was imminent. This work would bring in many workers and settlers next to the western boundary of the park and could result in encroachments and associated problems. The Bureau requested the Secretariat to contact the Peruvian authorities and to seek further explanation.

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 1988

Shell Petroleum and Petroperu have made commercial discovery of natural gas next to the park and an expanded exploration effort is to proceed.

Access roads and pipeline system will bring in many workers and settlers next to the western boundary. No guard posts are located here at present.

A letter of inquiry to the Royal Dutch Shell headquarters and to the Peruvian authorities should be sent.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 1988
12 BUR VII.14
State of conservation

14. The representative of IUCN reported on the status of three natural sites, two of which are inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger, as follows:

Manu National Park (Peru): A commercial discovery of natural gas had beenmade next to the park and further exploration work was imminent. This work would bring in many workers and settlers next to the western boundary of the park and could result in encroachments and associated problems. The Bureau requested the Secretariat to contact the Peruvian authorities and to seek* further explanation.

Djoudj National Park (Senegal): The water supply to this park which wasmodified by dam construction was now being assured by a sluice which had been built with the support of the World Heritage Fund. A management plan was also under preparation with funds from WWF. Although there was still a need to improve the management of this site, the Bureau recognized that the main threats were under control and requested the Secretariat to contact the Senegalese authorities with a view to removing this site from the List of World Heritage in Danger.

Ngorongoro Conservation Area (Tanzania): The general situation of this sitehad greatly improved. Equipment had been made available through the World Heritage Fund and IUCN was working to strengthen policy, planning and train­ing activities for the site with the Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism of Tanzania. The Bureau requested the Secretariat to contact the Tanzanian authorities with a view to removing this site from the List of World Heritage in Danger.

No draft Decision

Report year: 1988
Peru
Date of Inscription: 1987
Category: Natural
Criteria: (ix)(x)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top