Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

27
Reports
12
Properties concerned
13
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 1998close
Threats* : Localised utilitiesclose
Site of Palmyra (2015)
States Parties: Syrian Arab Republic
Year: 2015
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7A,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks
Danger List:  Yes
Site of Palmyra (1999)
States Parties: Syrian Arab Republic
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks
Site of Palmyra (1998)
States Parties: Syrian Arab Republic
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks
Taxila (2013)
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Lack of vegetation control
Taxila (2000)
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Lack of vegetation control
Taxila (1999)
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Lack of vegetation control
Tokaj Wine Region Historic Cultural Landscape (2011)
States Parties: Hungary
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Localised utilities
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Bangladesh Georgia Hungary Ireland Lithuania Mauritania Nepal Pakistan Republic of Korea Russian Federation Saudi Arabia Syrian Arab Republic Uzbekistan
Threats
Localised utilities 27

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top