Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

19
Reports
11
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2013close
Threats* : Localised utilitiesclose
Ancient Ksour of Ouadane, Chinguetti, Tichitt and Oualata (2006)
States Parties: Mauritania
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Localised utilities
Archaeological Site of Delphi (1993)
States Parties: Greece
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Need to strengthen the protection of the site
Auschwitz Birkenau
German Nazi Concentration and Extermination Camp (1940-1945) (1997)
States Parties: Poland
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.204/2B
Threats*: Localised utilities
Auschwitz Birkenau
German Nazi Concentration and Extermination Camp (1940-1945) (1996)
States Parties: Poland
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Localised utilities
Brú na Bóinne - Archaeological Ensemble of the Bend of the Boyne (2004)
States Parties: Ireland
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Localised utilities
Brú na Bóinne - Archaeological Ensemble of the Bend of the Boyne (2003)
States Parties: Ireland
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Localised utilities
Historic Centre of Bukhara (2011)
States Parties: Uzbekistan
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Localised utilities
Historical Monuments of Mtskheta (2013)
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7A
Threats*: Localised utilities
Danger List:  Yes
Ruins of the Buddhist Vihara at Paharpur (2007)
States Parties: Bangladesh
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Localised utilities
Seokguram Grotto and Bulguksa Temple (1999)
States Parties: Republic of Korea
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Localised utilities
Site of Palmyra (1999)
States Parties: Syrian Arab Republic
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks
Site of Palmyra (1998)
States Parties: Syrian Arab Republic
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks
Site of Palmyra (1997)
States Parties: Syrian Arab Republic
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.204/2B
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks
Site of Palmyra (1994)
States Parties: Syrian Arab Republic
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks
Taxila (2013)
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Lack of vegetation control
Taxila (2000)
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Lack of vegetation control
Taxila (1999)
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Lack of vegetation control
Taxila (1995)
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Localised utilities
Other Threats: Lack of vegetation control
Tokaj Wine Region Historic Cultural Landscape (2011)
States Parties: Hungary
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Localised utilities
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Bangladesh Georgia Greece Hungary Ireland Mauritania Pakistan Poland Republic of Korea Syrian Arab Republic Uzbekistan
Threats
Localised utilities 19

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top