Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2010close
Date end:2010close
Threats* : Ground transport infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
agra fortAgra Fort india India 2010 Ground transport infrastructure, No
bordeaux, port of the moonBordeaux, Port of the Moon france France 2010 Ground transport infrastructure, No
city of vicenza and the palladian villas of the venetoCity of Vicenza and the Palladian Villas of the Veneto italy Italy 2010 Ground transport infrastructure, No
fatehpur sikriFatehpur Sikri india India 2010 Ground transport infrastructure, No
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul turkiye Türkiye 2010 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas);
 No
historic centre of limaHistoric Centre of Lima peru Peru 2010 Ground transport infrastructure, No
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa peru Peru 2010 Ground transport infrastructure, No
old city of salamancaOld City of Salamanca spain Spain 2010 Ground transport infrastructure, No
port, fortresses and group of monuments, cartagenaPort, Fortresses and Group of Monuments, Cartagena colombia Colombia 2010 Ground transport infrastructure, No
taj mahalTaj Mahal india India 2010 Ground transport infrastructure, No
tyreTyre lebanon Lebanon 2010 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance
 No
upper middle rhine valleyUpper Middle Rhine Valley germany Germany 2010 Ground transport infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top