Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

215
Reports
70
Properties concerned
51
States Parties with SOC reports
Threats* : Interpretative and visitation facilitiesclose
States Parties: Chile
Year: 2021
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Paraguay
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Argentina Brazil
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2023
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add.2
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Structural integrity issues at the Church of the Transfiguration
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2021
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Structural integrity issues at the Church of the Transfiguration
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Structural integrity issues at the Church of the Transfiguration
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Other Threats: Structural integrity issues at the Church of the Transfiguration
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Czechia
Year: 2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B,WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Corr
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7A
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7A,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2015
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7A,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7A
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2013
Document Source: WHC-13/37.COM/7A
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7B
Threats*: Interpretative and visitation facilities

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top