Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2006close
Date end:2006close
Threats* : Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
angkorAngkor cambodia Cambodia 2006 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
complex of hue monumentsComplex of Hué Monuments viet nam Viet Nam 2006 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
ha long bay - cat ba archipelagoHa Long Bay - Cat Ba Archipelago viet nam Viet Nam 2006 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
historic centre (old town) of tallinnHistoric Centre (Old Town) of Tallinn estonia Estonia 2006 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
isole eolie (aeolian islands)Isole Eolie (Aeolian Islands) italy Italy 2006 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
old bridge area of the old city of mostarOld Bridge Area of the Old City of Mostar bosnia and herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina 2006 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
sagarmatha national parkSagarmatha National Park nepal Nepal 2006 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
serengeti national parkSerengeti National Park united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2006 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure, No
tyreTyre lebanon Lebanon 2006 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure,
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance
 No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top