Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 1996close
Date end:1996close
Threats* : Illegal activitiesclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
air and tenere natural reservesAir and Ténéré Natural Reserves niger Niger 1996 Illegal activities, Yes
arabian oryx sanctuaryArabian Oryx Sanctuary oman Oman 1996 Illegal activities, No
archaeological sites of bat, al-khutm and al-aynArchaeological Sites of Bat, Al-Khutm and Al-Ayn oman Oman 1996 Illegal activities,
Other Threats: Several repairs or preventive measures needed
No
garamba national parkGaramba National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 1996 Illegal activities, No
komodo national parkKomodo National Park indonesia Indonesia 1996 Illegal activities, No
manas wildlife sanctuaryManas Wildlife Sanctuary india India 1996 Illegal activities,
Other Threats: Destruction of Park infrastructures
Yes
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire
Guinea
1996 Illegal activities, Yes
plitvice lakes national parkPlitvice Lakes National Park croatia Croatia 1996 Illegal activities,
Other Threats: Neglected Park infrastructure
Yes
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve honduras Honduras 1996 Illegal activities, No
ruins of kilwa kisiwani and ruins of songo mnaraRuins of Kilwa Kisiwani and Ruins of Songo Mnara united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 1996 Illegal activities,
Other Threats: General poor state of conservation
No
sangay national parkSangay National Park ecuador Ecuador 1996 Illegal activities, Yes
virunga national parkVirunga National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 1996 Illegal activities, Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top