Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2009close
Date end:2009close
Threats* : Water (rain/water table)close
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
abu menaAbu Mena egypt Egypt 2009 Water (rain/water table), Yes
ancient thebes with its necropolisAncient Thebes with its Necropolis egypt Egypt 2009 Water (rain/water table), No
chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone peru Peru 2009 Water (rain/water table),
Other Threats: Continuous deterioration of earthen architecture structures and decorated surfaces from lack of conservation and maintenance practices
 Yes
djoudj national bird sanctuaryDjoudj National Bird Sanctuary senegal Senegal 2009 Water (rain/water table),
Other Threats: Salinisation of soils
 No
historic cairoHistoric Cairo egypt Egypt 2009 Water (rain/water table),
Other Threats: Dilapidated infrastructure; Neglect and lack of maintenance
 No
island of saint-louisIsland of Saint-Louis senegal Senegal 2009 Water (rain/water table),
Other Threats: Extremely poor state of conservation of numerous derelict buildings endangering occupants;
 No
jelling mounds, runic stones and churchJelling Mounds, Runic Stones and Church denmark Denmark 2009 Water (rain/water table),
Other Threats: surface deterioration of two runic stones, part of the overall property
 No
rock-hewn churches, lalibelaRock-Hewn Churches, Lalibela ethiopia Ethiopia 2009 Water (rain/water table),
Other Threats: Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches.
 No
ruins of the buddhist vihara at paharpurRuins of the Buddhist Vihara at Paharpur bangladesh Bangladesh 2009 Water (rain/water table), No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top