Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

10
Reports
6
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2002close
Threats* : Quarryingclose
States Parties: Hungary Slovakia
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5
Threats*: Quarrying
States Parties: Italy
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Quarrying
States Parties: Slovakia
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Quarrying
States Parties: Slovakia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Quarrying
States Parties: Malta
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Quarrying
Other Threats: Worrying state of conservation of some temples; Fragility of the structures (cracks, etc.); Partial collapse of a temple
States Parties: Malta
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6
Threats*: Quarrying
Other Threats: Worrying state of conservation of some temples; Fragility of the structures (cracks, etc.)
States Parties: China
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Quarrying
Other Threats: Lack of maintenance ; Industrial pollution
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5
Threats*: Quarrying
Other Threats: Lack of vegetation control
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Quarrying
Other Threats: Lack of vegetation control
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Quarrying
Other Threats: Lack of vegetation control
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
Threats
Quarrying 10

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top