Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

11
Reports
11
Properties concerned
11
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2011close
Date end:2011close
Threats* : Water infrastructureclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
ashur (qal'at sherqat)Ashur (Qal'at Sherqat) iraq Iraq 2011 Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: fragile mud brick structures
 Yes
dong phayayen-khao yai forest complexDong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex thailand Thailand 2011 Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors
 No
historic centre of the city of salzburgHistoric Centre of the City of Salzburg austria Austria 2011 Water infrastructure, No
keoladeo national parkKeoladeo National Park india India 2011 Water infrastructure, No
lake turkana national parksLake Turkana National Parks kenya Kenya 2011 Water infrastructure, No
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park senegal Senegal 2011 Water infrastructure, Yes
rio plátano biosphere reserveRío Plátano Biosphere Reserve honduras Honduras 2011 Water infrastructure, No
selous game reserveSelous Game Reserve united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2011 Water infrastructure,
Other Threats: b) Reduction of elephant populations;
 No
serengeti national parkSerengeti National Park united republic of tanzania United Republic of Tanzania 2011 Water infrastructure, No
talamanca range-la amistad reserves / la amistad national parkTalamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park costa rica,panama Costa Rica
Panama		 2011 Water infrastructure, No
three parallel rivers of yunnan protected areasThree Parallel Rivers of Yunnan Protected Areas china China 2011 Water infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top