Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

6
Reports
1
Properties concerned
1
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property: Roman Monuments, Cathedral of St Peter and Church of Our Lady in Trierclose
Roman Monuments, Cathedral of St Peter and Church of Our Lady in Trier (2001)
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Human resources Interpretative and visitation facilities Management systems/ management plan Water (rain/water table)
Roman Monuments, Cathedral of St Peter and Church of Our Lady in Trier (2000)
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Housing Management systems/ management plan
Roman Monuments, Cathedral of St Peter and Church of Our Lady in Trier (1999)
States Parties: Germany
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Housing Management systems/ management plan
Roman Monuments, Cathedral of St Peter and Church of Our Lady in Trier (1998)
States Parties: Germany
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B
Threats*: Housing
Roman Monuments, Cathedral of St Peter and Church of Our Lady in Trier (1997)
States Parties: Germany
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Housing
Roman Monuments, Cathedral of St Peter and Church of Our Lady in Trier (1996)
States Parties: Germany
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Housing
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Germany
Threats
Housing 5 Management systems/ management plan 3 Interpretative and visitation facilities 1 Water (rain/water table) 1 Human resources 1

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top