Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

17
Reports
4
Properties concerned
3
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2008close
Threats* : Deliberate destruction of heritageclose
Region: Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
historic centre of mexico city and xochimilcoHistoric Centre of Mexico City and Xochimilco mexico Mexico 2008 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla mexico Mexico 2003 Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Fire in December 2002
No
historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla mexico Mexico 2000 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla mexico Mexico 1999 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla mexico Mexico 1998 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla mexico Mexico 1995 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla mexico Mexico 1994 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
historic centre of pueblaHistoric Centre of Puebla mexico Mexico 1993 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa peru Peru 2008 Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Material decay and abandonment of buildings
No
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa peru Peru 2007 Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Material decay and abandonment of buildings
No
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa peru Peru 2006 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa peru Peru 2005 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa peru Peru 2004 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa peru Peru 2003 Deliberate destruction of heritage, No
humberstone and santa laura saltpeter worksHumberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Works chile Chile 2008 Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, in addition to stucco and lightweight construction; Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years ; Corrosion of metal cladding and dismantlement of some of the structural elements. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is given ; Very little conservation work carried out
Yes
humberstone and santa laura saltpeter worksHumberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Works chile Chile 2007 Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, and stucco and lightweight construction that functioned with regular maintenance; Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years ; Metal cladding corroded and some of the structural elements dismantled. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is given ; Very little conservation work carried ou
Yes
humberstone and santa laura saltpeter worksHumberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Works chile Chile 2006 Deliberate destruction of heritage,
Other Threats: a) Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, and stucco and lightweight construction that functioned with regular maintenanceb) Lack of maintenance for 40 years c) Metal cladding corroded and some of the structural elements dismantled. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is givend) Very little conservation work carried out
Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top