Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

29
Reports
10
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2004close
Threats* : Financial resourcesclose
Region: Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
Chavin (Archaeological Site) (2003)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
Chavin (Archaeological Site) (2002)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
Chavin (Archaeological Site) (2001)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
Chavin (Archaeological Site) (2000)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
Chavin (Archaeological Site) (1999)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
Chavin (Archaeological Site) (1998)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
Chavin (Archaeological Site) (1993)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/14
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Deterioration of the site
City of Cuzco (2004)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Deliberate neglect of historic properties
City of Quito (1999)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Financial resources
City of Quito (1998)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Financial resources
City of Quito (1993)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/14
Threats*: Financial resources
Cocos Island National Park (2002)
States Parties: Costa Rica
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Financial resources
Galápagos Islands (2004)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: a) Weaknesses in quarantine measures; b) Passage of international and national marine traffic
Galápagos Islands (2003)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Financial resources
Galápagos Islands (2002)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Financial resources
Galápagos Islands (2001)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Financial resources
Galápagos Islands (2000)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Financial resources
Galápagos Islands (1999)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Financial resources
Galápagos Islands (1998)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Financial resources
Galápagos Islands (1997)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.204/INF.9,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Financial resources
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Argentina Brazil Costa Rica Ecuador Haiti Honduras Paraguay Peru
Threats
Financial resources 29

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top