State of Conservation
24
Reports
10
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2015close
Region:
Latin America and the Caribbeanclose
| States Parties: |
 Peru
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Peru
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Peru
|
| Year: | 2015 |
| Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Peru
|
| Year: | 2013 |
| Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Peru
|
| Year: | 2010 |
| Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Mexico
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Need to initiate a process for the recovery of the urban and social fabric of the property |
| States Parties: |
 Brazil
|
| Year: | 2004 |
| Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Brazil
|
| Year: | 1990 |
| Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/3 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Peru
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Peru
|
| Year: | 2013 |
| Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Peru
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Peru
|
| Year: | 2011 |
| Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Peru
|
| Year: | 2010 |
| Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Chile
|
| Year: | 2007 |
| Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, and stucco and lightweight construction that functioned with regular maintenance; Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years ; Metal cladding corroded and some of the structural elements dismantled. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is given ; Very little conservation work carried ou |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Chile
|
| Year: | 2006 |
| Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | a) Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, and stucco and lightweight construction that functioned with regular maintenanceb) Lack of maintenance for 40 years c) Metal cladding corroded and some of the structural elements dismantled. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is givend) Very little conservation work carried out |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Haiti
|
| Year: | 2014 |
| Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Haiti
|
| Year: | 2013 |
| Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Haiti
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Haiti
|
| Year: | 2011 |
| Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Colombia
|
| Year: | 2012 |
| Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
