Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

77
Reports
28
Properties concerned
12
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date end:2007close
Threats* : Illegal activitiesclose
Region: Asia and the Pacificclose
Kathmandu Valley (2004)
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: Fire
Danger List:  Yes
Kaziranga National Park (2002)
States Parties: India
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: Elephant-human conflicts
Kaziranga National Park (2001)
States Parties: India
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: Elephant-human conflicts
Kaziranga National Park (2000)
States Parties: India
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5
Threats*: Illegal activities
Kaziranga National Park (1997)
States Parties: India
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.204/2B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Khajuraho Group of Monuments (2000)
States Parties: India
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Illegal activities
Komodo National Park (2002)
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2
Threats*: Illegal activities
Komodo National Park (2001)
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Illegal activities
Komodo National Park (2000)
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Illegal activities
Komodo National Park (1999)
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Illegal activities
Komodo National Park (1997)
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.204/2B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Komodo National Park (1996)
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Lorentz National Park (2007)
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Lorentz National Park (2004)
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: a) Security limitations on staff and public access to parts of the Park; b) Fire
Mahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya (2004)
States Parties: India
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Illegal activities
Mahabodhi Temple Complex at Bodh Gaya (2003)
States Parties: India
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr
Threats*: Illegal activities
Manas Wildlife Sanctuary (2007)
States Parties: India
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7A
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: Forced evacuation of Park staff; and Destruction of Park infrastructur
Danger List:  Yes
Manas Wildlife Sanctuary (2006)
States Parties: India
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: a) Forced evacuation of Park staffb) Destruction of Park infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
Manas Wildlife Sanctuary (2005)
States Parties: India
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: Destruction to park infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
Manas Wildlife Sanctuary (2004)
States Parties: India
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Illegal activities
Other Threats: Damaged Park infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Afghanistan Australia Bangladesh Cambodia China India Indonesia Lao People's Democratic Republic Nepal Philippines Turkmenistan Viet Nam
Threats
Illegal activities 77

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top