Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

10
Reports
10
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start: 2004close
Date end:2004close
Threats* : Ground transport infrastructureclose
Region: Asia and the Pacificclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
chitwan national parkChitwan National Park nepal Nepal 2004 Ground transport infrastructure, No
complex of hue monumentsComplex of Hué Monuments viet nam Viet Nam 2004 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Need for restoration and enhancement of the monumental architecture of Hué
No
group of monuments at hampiGroup of Monuments at Hampi india India 2004 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
historic monuments of ancient naraHistoric Monuments of Ancient Nara japan Japan 2004 Ground transport infrastructure, No
lorentz national parkLorentz National Park indonesia Indonesia 2004 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Security limitations on staff and public access to parts of the Park; b) Fire
No
minaret and archaeological remains of jamMinaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam afghanistan Afghanistan 2004 Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Need for consolidation and restoration of the monument
Yes
phong nha-ke bang national parkPhong Nha-Ke Bang National Park viet nam Viet Nam 2004 Ground transport infrastructure, No
rice terraces of the philippine cordillerasRice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras philippines Philippines 2004 Ground transport infrastructure, Yes
town of luang prabangTown of Luang Prabang lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic 2004 Ground transport infrastructure, No
vat phou and associated ancient settlements within the champasak cultural landscapeVat Phou and Associated Ancient Settlements within the Champasak Cultural Landscape lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic 2004 Ground transport infrastructure, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top