Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

68
Reports
68
Properties concerned
50
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2012close
Date end:2012close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas)
States Parties: Barbados
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Dilapidated infrastructure; Neglect and lack of maintenance
States Parties: Czechia
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Romania
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Deterioration of monuments in general and fortifications in particular, weak protection and maintenance measures;
States Parties: Uruguay
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Yemen
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Pakistan
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Chile
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Extremely fragile nature of the industrial buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, in addition to stucco and lightweight construction; b) Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years; c) Corrosion of metal cladding and dismantlement of some of the structural elements. A few buildings such as the Leaching House are liable to structural collapse if no support is given; d) Very little conservation work carried out
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Growing number of collapsed or seriously dilapidated buildings
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Ukraine
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Kenya
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Impact of the new structure of the Maya Devi Temple (constructed in 2002) on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity.
States Parties: Andorra
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top