Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

26
Reports
26
Properties concerned
19
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2009close
Date end:2009close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
States Parties: Poland
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Slow process of consultation with local communities.
States Parties: Albania
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Slow progress on the implementation of the recommendations of the joint missions
States Parties: Austria
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Malta
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Portugal
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: b) Lack of conservation of parks and palaces;
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: General need for interior and exterior conservation work on the monuments
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areaslack of impact studies before large-scale developments are implemented
States Parties: Estonia
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Impact of the transportation of hazardous materials to the Old Town
States Parties: Italy
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: lack of continuous maintenance of the urban fabric
States Parties: Czechia
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Albania
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: a) Fire; b) Lack of specific monitoring indicator; c) Lack of adequate firefighting arrangements in the historic urban zone; d) Lack of a programme of archaeological excavation
States Parties: Georgia
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: f) Loss of authenticity
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration
States Parties: Ukraine
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Serbia
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7A.Add,WHC-09/33.COM/7A.Add.Corr
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: e) Unsatisfactory state of conservation and maintenance of the property
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Montenegro
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Spain
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Year: 2009
Document Source: WHC-09/33.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top